Our Blogs

After years in dispute resolution, I have learned that conflict rarely announces itself when it begins to escalate. More often, it reveals itself in the small things.

I remember mediating a dispute between two business partners who had worked together for more than a decade. The disagreement was about money and decision-making, but the real tension was becoming difficult to miss.

One would begin speaking, and the other would interrupt.

A question would be met with, “But you always…”

At one point, one partner said, “I have explained this five times.”

The other replied, “And you have ignored it five times.”

That exchange told me more than either of their opening statements.

The dispute was no longer only about the decision that had brought them into the room. It had become about whether either of them felt heard, respected, or trusted.

This is something mediators learn to notice, I know I did: the subject of a dispute and the dispute itself are not always the same thing.

Repeated phrases often reveal the same shift.

“I was never consulted.”

“You do not trust me.”

“I have been doing everything.”

“I just want this to be recognised.”

These statements may appear to be about a decision, a payment, or a process. But sometimes, they point towards something deeper — a need for acknowledgment, certainty, or fairness that has not yet been addressed.

And interestingly, escalation is not always loud.

Sometimes it is the party that stops responding, looks down at their notes, and says, “It does not matter,” when it clearly does. Silence can reflect exhaustion, disappointment, or a decision to disengage. It should not automatically be mistaken for agreement.

Not every dispute can be resolved through communication. Some require litigation, arbitration, or other formal processes. Some relationships cannot, or should not, continue in their previous form.

But even where the legal position is clear, the way people communicate can influence how a dispute develops and what options remain available to them.

Over the years, I have come to understand that my role is not simply to help people reach an agreement. It is to help them see the dispute more clearly, including the parts they may not be able to see while they are inside it.

I have seen conversations change when someone finally feels heard. I have seen a difficult discussion become more constructive when a party realises that the other person’s concern is not quite what they had assumed.

Those moments are not always dramatic. Sometimes, they are as simple as a pause, a change in tone, or a sentence that begins, “I had not thought of it that way.”

And that is perhaps what I have come to value most about mediation: the opportunity to help people move from defending their position to understanding what might make resolution possible.

Because often, before a dispute can move forward, someone has to recognize that the conversation has changed.